|
jay123jd (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Tard cannot see the forest for the trees.
TruthersAreRetarded (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Watch as the truther censor marks down posts that disagree with his insane theories.So much for free speech, when truthers are around.He is desperately trying to mark these posts as spam, in order to have posters who disagree with him removed by youtube.Its an admission of defeat, the truth movement dont like their theories questioned.
TruthersAreRetarded (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
flight77(dot)info has a list of the videos, only one shows the actual impact.
jesperdepesper (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
where do the pictures of the explosion at the pentagon come from
TruthersAreRetarded (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
"Americans cant take their president to court while he is still in office."So you have a couple of months to get your evidence together.Are you doing that?What law firm are you using?
delicato024 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Americans cant take their president to court while he is still in office.
TruthersAreRetarded (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
"if president Bush was charged with murder, would you agree he should testify by himself, under oath, with visual recording, audio recording, and a written transcript available to the public?"Yes.But he hasnt been charged with murder and no evidence has been submitted to any prosecution either.Thats the whole point.When are you intending to do this?
bIZAROsPRMN11 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
TruthersAreRetarded,"you will have no problem pointing out these lies ...when are you planning on bringing a case to court?"a fallacy: it does not necessarily follow that you would recognize a lie.if president Bush was charged with murder, would you agree he should testify by himself, under oath, with visual recording, audio recording, and a written transcript available to the public?failure of critical thinking = failure of justice system.
TruthersAreRetarded (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Personally I cant wait to see a troofer case go to court.It will be comedy gold.Maybe you could bring up your "no planes" evidence izzy.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
TruthersAreRetarded (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
"The governments account of 911 is full of lies therefore it defines itself as guilty demeanor. That is admissable as evidence."Then you will have no problem pointing out these lies will you?Also, when are you planning on bringing a case to court?All I see is whining on youtube and dead troofer sites.Surely if you have some evidence about 9/11 being an inside job, then you would be taking this to court? |
