Slorginvader (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Dennis Kucinich

N1GWANNNAC1G (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

whos the guy name that answered the question

hannamanna (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

heart heart G

saxmanchiro (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Your attacking the messenger. WWF report is the culprit.

markbotv3 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

LOL what? it was 5 billion in 1980 6 billion in 1994 and now its 7.1 billion...9.5 in 2100? your out of your freakin mind!!!! if every child bearing woman had only one baby the pop would double in four years. not to mention 2 4 or 6 babys...you must have a seriously pesamistic view of the future my friend.

saxmanchiro (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

markCheck out WWF- "Living Planet Report-06"They have three scenarios plotted with range of 8.9 bill in 2050 to 9.5 in 2100. They have a very well done piece of pop. biology in their report. Ecological footprint for humans is not looking good. Check it out

markbotv3 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

the only factor for population max isnt land its food distribution. humans dont take up that much space but the ability to distribute food determins max cap. as food technology increases and distribution nodes so will population. in industrial nations children are seen as i financial burden so growth is going down but in most thirdworld nations children are seen as financial boons.

markbotv3 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

its not that high...where did you get your number? we will be at 9 billion in 4 years. 18 billion in 20 years

saxmanchiro (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

markWhere did they get their info from? The number is out there in the stratosphere and somewhat, IMO, high. Paper/journal ??

markbotv3 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Future Farmers of America...who should know more about population caps then the people who Controll the population?