coz2112 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

how many buildings in the pentagon? 25employees? 25,000number per building? 1000.Thousands. Just at the pentagon would have seen it.

coz2112 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

sorry wakenbake, you are flat out wrong.There were an estimated 2600 people just around the impact site. there were thousands more than that working in the rest of the pentagon. then all the surrounding apartments and hotels.of course thousands of people would see it.don't try to say its false. its a fact.

burnthermit (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

why is all of this even necessary??obviously because the government is hiding something thats why the 911 calls have not been released nor any of the security camera video from any of the surrounding businesses.what a stupid video

kranski7 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

No witnesses to plane hitting the poles is very strange since there were *5* of them and it would be something to remember, poles flying all over the place. They were already down in preperation. In 2004 a jet on-route to Houston to pick up Bush senior clipped *1* pole and it ripped the whole wing off. FL77 hit's 5 poles and no wing debris scattered. 9/11 the HOAX.

wakenbake22 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

There aren't witnesses to the plane hitting the poles.Why?Well, you'd claim because the plane and fireball "distracted" them or something...Pure nonsense.It didn't happen. No poles were hit by the plane, because the plane flew north of Citgo. Sucherman sees the plane flying away after, but he doesn't instantly think conspiracy as you claim he would. He thinks it was a "second" plane. It is that simple.

wakenbake22 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Your claim that 1000s would see it flying away after the explosion is FALSE.Check a map.I have given several specific examples of why witnesses don't see it.There aren't 1000s of witnesses to the plane before, so why would you insist there HAD TO BE 1000s of it after?

wakenbake22 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

coz Here is what you are saying.A lack of fly over witnesses in the media prove that all 12 of the NoC witnesses are wrong.Nope.The 911 calls aren't public, so if you were there and called, the public isn't aware of your statement.There are fly over witnesses, yet you claim these aren't enough.Smoke from the Pentagon, seeing a plane in the sky. You are IDIOTIC to claim 1000s would think this plane flying away had ANYTHING to do with the smoke.

wakenbake22 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Prove that there are 1000s who should've seen it. Look at a map.You are wrong about this, making it up to help your "debate"No, you are wrong, again.

wakenbake22 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

The 911 calls aren't available to the public. Why?

coz2112 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

wakenbake, if what you are saying were the official story, you would never believe it. It doesn't meet your own criteria for proof.Ask the same questions you ask of the official account to yours. Does it hold up?Not believeing the official account is not the same as positing what actually did. If what you say is true, it must be scrutinized the exact same way you scrutinize the official account.