bustbool (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

what imagination? wasnt it based on a book someone else wrote?

mimosveta (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I think he is right in what his saying, but wrong for saying it. He should not try to explain anything to anyone, for those who can, will understand anyway. Those who can't, or won't, will only use explanation to round their collection of misunderstandings.

sneezuschrist (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I love how everyone magically has balls on the internet. people getting up in arms about movie opinions just makes me lololol..

samoator (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

GOOD MOVIE!!!!!

jeremydean (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Love ya Terry, but the movie should SHOW us how to view the events through the eyes of a child instead of you TELLing us. If you ask me it failed in that respect (although it was disturbing and interesting) because it was too hard to identify with her. A plotless film CAN be fascinating - but this one just dragged.

daveismyreligion (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Love love love Tideland and Gilliam!

bustbool (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

i dont see lovely there

bustbool (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

um she was trying to seduce a mentally ill guy and shes 8 or something

bustbool (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

u again? shut up cuntface ur as delusional as that little girl

bustbool (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

ur the 1 that started it. the other lady said she didnt like the movie, not that she didnt like u. i cant take dumb art film knowitall bitches like u. and u r a pedo if u find anything lovely about a little makking out with a mentally ill crazy man sporting dinamite. have fun takeing the virginity of sick people and talking to squirrels idiot. rot in hell u disgusting cunt