|
mcnarycelt75 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
heath's voice, looks, and overall character is an absolute masterpiece, i dont think anyone will ever be able to replace that performance
S1cKSh0T477 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Heaatthhhh.....
Erica9993 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
That was an amazing vid!! great job!! That should've been a trailer.
VitalSignsL0w (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
the voice and make up on heath are better
reginaron (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
1.Cesar Romero. Don't even bother to try to replace him. 1940's comic book Joker is scarier than, anything else. And Cesar had nothing else to go on..Batman was only 25 yrs. old then.2.End the Jack vs. Heath Debate!4.Heath because he was told to act like Joker, not, campy.3.Jack Nicholson was great as "Joker"!! Especially his smile.
LestatandBerial (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
They were both good jokers. But I have to go with Heath Ledger. He was a joker by choice. JAck fell into a vat and became joker. Ledger's the way he is because he wants to. Not because he was forced.
shadow1dx (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
The script does matter but to an extent, you can't base preparation and performance over a script. Heath went to a hotel room for a month living by himself, practicing the voice, laugh and mental state of the Joker.Although I agree with everything else you said.
ZoKayComputer (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
I would have enjoyed Jack more if Tim Burton wasn't the director; his stlye (in this case) annoys the hell out of me.
keitherts (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
you're a great actor jack, but i gotta give it to heath, he's just nailed this role
michiganana (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
therefore he 'would' have to be a darker character.the script does matter. thats how an actor prepares for a role. its like saying an actors playing the king in a film but acting it like some baywatch babe |
