|
nicolasnaf (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
same thing at 10.25...
nicolasnaf (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
From 5.12 to 5.19... The version I'm use to, also played by Heifetz, is a little bit different... that is strange!!
garlichotdog (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Touche my good sir
dogtransport (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Tchaikovsky is a communist and a homosexual. I love rap music.
Imasianurnotstfu (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
agreed...but i finally decided that it would be best not to think of it as "is heifetz's or oistrakh's tchaikovsky better" but rather I look at both and enjoy them both for what they both are-absolute masterpieces of music to be treasured and enjoyed :)
iamemod (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
i think it's the video quality. :PHeifetz was a really good player though.This is post romantic music, you might be intrested in baroque or classical music.
iamemod (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
no:P i mean they all create their own emotion at the cadenza, by picking their pressure of bow, bow speed, shiftings, etc, but they are still playing what is written, just adding a little personal emotion. Had it be improvising a piece never heard, they would probably probably play all the dynamics backwards, bowing backwards, different shiftings, but nonetheless, all music is real music. :D i hope i cleared it for you.
ggmuze (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Sorry, I'm very confused by what you are saying here. Are you actually suggesting that Heifetz, Fritz Reiner, and the orchestra are improvising?
dtjesus (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Incredible stuff
HilldogTroy29 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
It goes without saying that Tchaikovsky did a great composition. I guess it also goes without saying that Heifetz did a great interpretation. |
